Affirmative Action in Hierarchies
نویسنده
چکیده
Abstract There is considerable evidence that males are more prone to take risks than females. This difference has implications for rates of promotion in hierarchies where promotion is based on random signals of ability. I explore the promotion consequences of three types of performance standards: gender-blind standards, standards designed to promote agents of equal ability on average, and standards designed to promote equal numbers of both genders. These three objectives lead to different promotion standards, which highlights among other things that the goal of affirmative action is not well defined. Lower promotion standards for females can be necessary to ensure either equal abilities or equal numbers in the promoted populations.
منابع مشابه
Risk taking and gender in hierarchies
In a labor market hierarchy, promotions are affected by the noisiness of information about the candidates. I study the hypothesis that males are more risk taking than females, and its implications for rates of promotion and abilities of survivors. I define promotion hierarchies with and without memory, where memory means that promotion depends on the entire history of success. In both types of ...
متن کاملInvestigating detailed educational aims Preschool in Iranian National Curriculum upon Islamic Theory of Action
Abstract: This researchr examines educational aims and goals of preschool stage in Iranian national curriculum. This examination is based on Islamic theory of action in childhood and carried out by using conceptual and comparative analysis methods. In a holistic view, it seems that these aims encounter 4 challenges. The first challenge is related to psychological requirements of children during...
متن کاملThe Tale of Two Cultures: Attitudes towards Affirmative Action in the United States and India
This study seeks to inform multinational corporations as they integrate domestic and international affirmative action policies and strategies. Improvement of these abilities can have important implications for human resource management and organizational productivity outcomes. To increase our understanding of the international perspectives of affirmative action, we examine employee perceptions ...
متن کاملAffirmative Action and Racial Segregation
Prior research suggests that statewide affirmative action bans reduce minority representation at selective colleges while leaving overall minority college enrollment unchanged. The effect of these bans on racial segregation across colleges, as measured by standard exposure and dissimilarity indexes, has not yet been estimated directly and is theoretically ambiguous due to a Ushaped relationship...
متن کاملUnderstanding affirmative action.
Affirmative action is a controversial and often poorly understood policy. It is also a policy that has been widely studied by social scientists. In this review, we outline how affirmative action operates in employment and education settings and consider the major points of controversy. In addition, we detail the contributions of psychologists and other social scientists in helping to demonstrat...
متن کامل